I see tournament novices make this mistake time and time again.

We’re in the same tournament, and this time I manage to get involved with something other than A-J, although not by much: A-Q, in the big blind. Two players had limped, and I decided to look at the fl op without a raise, figuring I wouldn’t be placed on this particular hand.

The flop came 5♦, 4♠, Q♦; pretty fair, except for the flush draw. The player to my left was fairly aggressive and I figured he would bet my pot for me. I checked, and sure enough, he bet 0. The other limper called, and I moved in, a raise of about ,000. I didn’t want to give a flush draw the right price to play.

The player on my left called so fast that I assumed he either had the same hand or a small set. The third player got out, and my opponent turned over K♦-9♦: a non-nut-flush draw. There was 0 in the pot, and he was going to have to put ,000 in to go for the hand.

There was a pretty reasonable case for him to think that he had outs other than diamonds, that is, for him to think that the other three Kings were also outs. This gave him 12 outs and roughly 46% winning chances, although if I had been semi-bluffi ng with the nut-flush draw, certainly a realistic possibility, he would have been in bad shape.

I suspect this fellow wasn’t even thinking about his Kings as outs; he was, as I’ve seen with so many players, just too excited about having a big draw. Draws are death in tournaments. They might be fine in your limit money game, where six people see the flop, but calling with a draw is just asking to be eliminated.

There’s no chance to win with your bet: your hand has to hold up, and you haven’t made a hand yet.

Recognising that you’re playing someone who will call big bets with draws is a double-edged sword. You may not want to bet if you don’t really want the action. If you can make the drawer’s price terrible, though, the play is worthwhile. Where you can really find an edge is when you locate someone who will call with a draw with just one card to come, rather than two. Just hope you can get either of these guys on your left, and bet them for value until the cows come home.

Even if the pot had been large enough to offer my opponent fair pot odds, you’re not looking for fair pot odds situations in tournaments either. Chips are just too difficult to replenish, and only a weak player would gamble like that.

It can be tough to let your hand go if you haven’t been catching cards or hitting flops. If you bet enough to stand a very good chance of winning with the bet, you can consider it. Calling for most or all of your stack with a draw is only slightly better than calling with small pairs. At least when you call with your draw, if it is the nut draw, you don’t risk running into a dominated hand situation.

I wouldn’t argue too strongly with someone who felt that calling a huge bet with a pure draw, even a draw to the nuts, is actually the worst play in poker. The pot odds you’re getting might prove to be a mitigating factor, because even if it’s your whole stack you’re risking, if four people have already gone all-in and you have the nut-fl ush draw (knowing you’re up against at least one set, possibly more, so suited cards that pair the board are no use to you), the play can be right.

But you’re very rarely going to run into that sort of situation. Big-bet poker is usually heads-up, and when you can’t replenish your stack, merely calling with a hand that isn’t yet a hand usually spells doom.